--- title: Branch Closings, Digital Channels Put Banks at a CRA Crossroads description: Branch closings due to the pandemic and a changing banking industry with a greater focus on digital offerings have created higher risk for banks in meeting CRA standards. image: https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/hubfs/SCG_21032_Bank_Closing_Graphics_D3_v1.jpg --- [![Spinnaker Consulting Logo](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/hubfs/spinnaker-logo.svg "Spinnaker Consulting Logo")](https://spinnakerconsultinggroup.com) [tel:804.510.0768](tel:804.510.0768) Menu - [Culture](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/culture) - [Work](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/work) - [Differentiators](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/differentiators) - [Insights](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights) - [Experts](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/experts) - [Contact Us](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/contact) Risk Management & Regulatory Compliance, Issue Management, Governance & Policy 6 minute read # Branch Closings, Digital Channels Put Banks at a CRA Crossroads Nov 18, 2021 Written by: Elizabeth Snyder - Share Post: - [mailto:?subject=Spinnaker%20Consulting:%20Branch%20Closings,%20Digital%20Channels%20Put%20Banks%20at%20a%20CRA%20Crossroads&body=Here%20are%20some%20insights%20from%20Spinnaker%20Consulting%20I%20think%20you%20should%20check%20out:%20https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/cra_crossroads](mailto:?subject=Spinnaker%20Consulting:%20Branch%20Closings,%20Digital%20Channels%20Put%20Banks%20at%20a%20CRA%20Crossroads&body=Here%20are%20some%20insights%20from%20Spinnaker%20Consulting%20I%20think%20you%20should%20check%20out:%20https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/cra_crossroads) - Not too long ago, banks primarily served their communities through their expansive network of branches, with customers walking in and out of physical locations dotted across their institution’s footprint. In recent years, digital transformation efforts to meet customers online and through applications have pushed traffic away from those traditional brick-and-mortar branches.  This shift, which had been in the works in various shapes and forms for nearly two decades, escalated at lightning speed starting in March 2020: The swift arrival of the coronavirus prompted banks to shut down branches almost overnight to protect both customers and employees. Financial services leaders scrambled for safe ways to operate in an unprecedented, large-scale public health crisis for which they had no playbook – and which has left many branches still in long-term limbo.  At risk of being overlooked is how these evolutions will challenge organizations to comply with the [Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)](https://www.federalreserve.gov/consumerscommunities/cra_about.htm), a federal regulation designed to ensure banks conveniently serve the credit needs of their communities, including low- to moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods Just because branch networks – historically the backbone for assessing CRA activity – are disappearing doesn’t mean that banks’ responsibilities to community development are dissipating at the same rapid rate. Instead, as the banking industry launches new strategies and channels to meet customers where they are, it must also determine how to ensure modern practices conform to a more than 40-year-old regulation.   With the impact of fast-paced disruptions to traditional channels and the lingering pandemic still being felt, banks must be prepared for greater scrutiny regarding their branch closing decisions. Frankly, whether the spirit of CRA has evolved along with the banking environment isn’t the point right now (though the pandemic and robust digitalization have prompted regulators to tee up reform), as the existing law remains the barometer for assessing fair credit practices – particularly when it comes to reviewing a bank’s policies regarding LMI communities.  ## **Americans’ Banking Habits Are Changing**  Even before the pandemic, people were changing how they managed their money and how they engaged with their bank. The modern interaction model certainly doesn’t mirror the banking experience of 1977, when CRA was enacted.   Between 2008 and 2020, [banks shuttered more than 13,000 locations](https://ncrc.org/research-brief-bank-branch-closure-update-2017-2020/), representing 14% of all branches across the country, and those closures disproportionately impacted customers living in low-income areas. The pandemic expedited branch closings, with a [record shutdown of 3,324 bank or thrift branches](https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/us-banks-shutter-record-number-of-branches-in-2020-62083337) in 2020.  As your bank comes up for its next CRA evaluation – the frequency of which is typically determined by past performance – use this time to shore up answers to tougher questions about how you’re meeting your community’s needs. And remember that this will be complicated because regulators’ attention will be focused mainly on decisions you made years ago, with minimal grace given to crisis-state branch closures due to the pandemic.  Banking leaders shouldn’t minimize your response because a poor CRA rating will hinder your bank’s strategy – including mergers and acquisitions – even stopping you in your tracks because of something you did at a single moment in time. On top of that, the CRA review, which can take up to a year for a large bank, includes subjective elements: While financial organizations follow a general checklist on what to report and include, the interpretation of different requirements varies among examiners. Poorly presenting your story at this pivotal juncture could put your bank back at square one, assembling documentation for another exam in less than a year.  ## **Why Branch Closings Are Hot Buttons**  One way banks should be able to defend their branch closings is by demonstrating how they remain open to serving LMI and other underserved communities through alternative avenues. They might continue to operate ATMs in neighborhoods that once featured a branch, or promote the availability of services that are accessible via telephone and digital channels.  But not every service can be completed through a virtual or phone experience, no matter how sophisticated the financial organization is. Some transactions still must be handled in a branch, such as getting a cashier’s check, and if customers have to travel an hour to handle that occasional business, then your organization isn’t meeting the definition of convenience.  Permanent branch shutdowns in LMI localities will negatively affect a bank’s service test during their CRA review. It makes no difference if the decision was justified due to COVID-19 safety precautions. As the Federal Reserve of St. Louis has detailed, [closings in underserved areas can have drastic consequences](https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/bridges/fall-2019/cra-considerations-for-branch-closings): decreased access to personal baking products, financial education, and training; and diminished interaction between banks and community organizations. Branch closings can also drive increased reliance on non-traditional financial institutions such as check-cashing stores and payday lenders, whose services often come with higher price tags.  Through their responses to ongoing CRA exams, banks routinely self-report their service footprint, made up of “assessment areas,” which means regulators have a track record of where branches have historically been located. Making changes to assessment areas, such as lopping off LMI neighborhoods where you no longer have branches, going into your next exam will only lead regulators (or watchdogs) to say that you’re redlining those communities – particularly if the data suggests you’re cutting off certain census tracts based on their socioeconomic makeup. If you’re not actively growing your footprint, then your assessment areas should be fairly consistent from exam to exam.  How banks consistently and fairly serve credit needs across communities is already a hot button in the eyes of regulators due to issues with other pandemic-instigated provisions – from emergency business loans to mortgage forbearance. [Many banks limited access to Paycheck Protection Program applications](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/ppp_risk) to their existing customers, and borrowers in LMI neighborhoods often lack the engagement with bankers that was critical to getting their applications in the door before the funds ran out. Homeowners in those same communities are disproportionately represented among those exiting [federal forbearance programs](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/mortgage_forbearance). With longstanding pressure on them for solid CRA performance now intensified, banks can’t afford the risk of a misstep right now.  ## **What Banks Must Do for Today’s CRA Exams**  Preparing for a CRA exam is never an easy task for any organization, but in today’s hyper-regulatory environment, you need to take a more strategic approach to how you present your CRA performance. Generally, that starts with a backward look at any actions – particularly those short-term decisions prompted by COVID – that could negatively impact your CRA rating. How can you relay those stories in the best light to your oversight agencies? Here are a few steps to get started:  1. **Develop cross-bank collaboration.** Every bank experiences a natural tug-of-war between departments charged with protecting the bottom line and those protecting CRA ratings, and you need to short up the balance between the two. Knowing pandemic branch closings will lead to greater scrutiny, work across departments to understand what you’ve been doing differently – including the process you use to determine whether a branch will remain permanently closed – and analyze how that might have an impact on your CRA rating. Banks are not the same as they were before COVID, but expect regulators to follow old practices and not account for decisions made because of the pandemic.   2. **Align your story with today’s new banking environment.** This starts with understanding neighborhoods and the needs of their residents. Perhaps a branch in question is located in a neighborhood where residents leave to work elsewhere, limiting their ability to drop in during operating hours. If five hours pass and no one walks in, is that branch truly serving the community? Online banking tutorials in the evening at the local library or a weekend pop-up branch might meet those customers where they want to be – and that’s the kind of story you want to illustrate with specific proof points.  3. **Develop community relationships.** Make this a two-way street, complete with community leader partnerships that provide insight on residents’ needs. Again, the CRA exam goes beyond personal banking services to investments in initiatives that serve the greater community, such as funding low-income housing projects.   4. **Own your story.** Banks will close branches in LMI areas, and the pandemic may have led to some of those closings, but that’s only part of the story. You must also speak to the other things you’re doing to serve those communities. A closed branch might have served a finite number of residents (and you need to be up front that closing that location did save you money), but perhaps you increased your investment through community loans for small businesses, or your leaders served on community boards during that review period. You need investment targets in every CRA bucket. If you’re not meeting those targets – and if you’re still closing branches – you’re going to face tough times with regulators. Finally, always be aware that your regulators will discount a portion of what you define as community development initiatives, so you’ll need to over-deliver on your targets.  ## **Stay the Course with Reform on the Horizon**  Frankly, based on our previous on-the-ground experience helping banks meet CRA standards, we recognize many aspects of the regulation are much less relevant today. While the OCC took an early, proactive call to strengthen the CRA and its mission to address credit inequities, reform now is on the radar of the multiple federal agencies charged with its oversight.  Fortunately, the OCC has pulled back on changes from 2020, with the Federal Reserve and FDIC now on board for a [joint CRA overhaul](https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-ia-2021-77.html) that will “best achieve a consistent, modernized framework across all banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they do business, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.” However, until those changes are identified and implemented, banks must adhere to the CRA as it is written. That makes how you represent your community activities to support the act’s broad objectives – while the historical marker of fully staffed branches is diminishing – all the more critical.  ## **Don’t Go Into the Exam Process Alone**  As former banking professionals responsible for preparing for CRA exams, our Spinnaker consultants have the hands-on experience and deep knowledge needed to assist clients in effectively developing their stories and identifying the supporting documents and related decision-making regulators expect to see. Rather than put your bank at risk of receiving a poor rating that could halt your growth strategies on the spot, find out how our experts can advise you in presenting your bank’s commitment to CRA and how you serve all of your communities, including LMI areas.  *Spinnaker Consultants Veronica Baker-Adams, Holly Higginbotham and Chris Lucas contributed to this post.*  - Share This Post - [mailto:?subject=Spinnaker%20Consulting:%20Branch%20Closings,%20Digital%20Channels%20Put%20Banks%20at%20a%20CRA%20Crossroads&body=Here%20are%20some%20insights%20from%20Spinnaker%20Consulting%20I%20think%20you%20should%20check%20out:%20https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/cra_crossroads](mailto:?subject=Spinnaker%20Consulting:%20Branch%20Closings,%20Digital%20Channels%20Put%20Banks%20at%20a%20CRA%20Crossroads&body=Here%20are%20some%20insights%20from%20Spinnaker%20Consulting%20I%20think%20you%20should%20check%20out:%20https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/cra_crossroads) - ## Related Articles ### [End of Forbearance Programs Puts Unprepared Banks at Risk Sep 30, 2021 Any action taken in the interest of a customer in a single, perhaps pivotal, moment in time has the potential to get flipped on its head and cause difficulty down the road. Risk Management & Regulatory Compliance, Compliance, Risk Management, Governance & Policy 6 minute read](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/mortgage_forbearance) ### [Internal Controls: Your Bank's Seat Belt System Sep 8, 2025 Your Bank's Seatbelt: Why Internal Controls are Non-Negotiable You’d never drive without a seatbelt. It's a simple, non-negotiable step that protects you from severe injury in the event of an accident. While door locks are a barrier to keep things out, the seatbelt provides the critical restraint needed to keep you safe inside. Much like a seatbelt, effective internal controls protect a financial institution from the severe impacts of fraud, financial misreporting, and regulatory penalties. They are the non-negotiable safeguard that keeps your bank secure. Ready to buckle up? Let's look at the key components of a strong internal control environment. 1. Communication: The Owner’s Manual and the Driver's Nudge Every vehicle comes with an owner's manual that explains how to operate its safety features, and a good driver will remind passengers to buckle up. In a bank, policies and procedures (P&Ps) are that manual. They provide clear instructions on how job functions should operate and how controls are executed. A common pitfall is relying on outdated P&Ps or failing to communicate updates effectively. When P&Ps are not regularly reviewed and updated, or when training is skipped, employees are left operating in a state of confusion. This lack of clarity can lead to inconsistent execution, leaving your organization vulnerable to risk. To ensure your controls are consistently applied, you must: Periodically review and update P&Ps to reflect current policies and processes. Facilitate training and communication (via team huddles, emails, or alerts) whenever a change is made, just like a driver's reminder to buckle up before the vehicle moves. 2. Compliance: Obeying the Rules of the Road Just as seatbelt laws vary from state to state, so do the regulations that govern financial institutions. It's up to every driver to understand and follow the rules of the road. In banking, state and federal regulations are your rules—and they are constantly changing. Many organizations get caught in the trap of "reactive compliance," scrambling to catch up only after an audit, exam, or customer complaint identifies an issue. This chaotic, last-minute approach not only puts the institution at risk of penalties but also impacts employee morale and the quality of the control assessment. A proactive approach is vital. When new regulatory guidance is issued, you must: Swiftly identify the impact on your organization. Timely implement or enhance controls to ensure compliance. You wouldn't wait for a ticket to learn a new speed limit, so you shouldn't wait for an examination to implement a new regulation. Provide training and communication on new or updated regulations to ensure employees understand their responsibilities and are equipped to perform their jobs in a compliant manner. 3. Monitoring & Testing: The Dashboard Alert Before a seatbelt ever hits the market, it's tested to ensure it works. Modern cars also have a dashboard alert that reminds you to buckle up. These alerts are designed to pester you until you buckle up. In the control arena, monitoring and testing are your alerts. They provide assurance that controls are operating as they should. Failure to properly plan testing and monitoring can give you a false sense of security. Pitfalls include: Incomplete testing scopes and inaccurate results, which can be as dangerous as a faulty seatbelt. Over-reliance on first-line testing, which can create a breeding ground for bias and conflicts of interest. A lack of clear direction for employees on what to do when an issue is identified, leaving a “check engine” light on with no way to fix the problem. Even with the best intentions, these failure modes happen. To circumvent them, organizations should: Plan properly with specific, measurable, and achievable objectives and realistic timelines. Involve second and third lines of defense to ensure objectivity and independence, creating checks and balances throughout the organization. Empower front-line employees and establish clear channels for reporting issues so that no alert goes unnoticed or is ignored. Implement continuous monitoring to proactively identify issues before they become significant problems. 4. Leadership Buy-In: Leading by Example When a driver buckles up, it influences passengers to do the same. Leadership buy-in in a bank is no different. When leaders are committed to a strong control environment, they set the tone from the top and demonstrate that the "rules of the road" are non-negotiable. If leaders operate in "loopholes" or allow management overrides to circumvent controls, employees will follow suit. This can lead to confusion and inconsistent execution, much like a driver weaving in and out of lanes, showing passengers that the rules don't matter. A good leader establishes expectations and demonstrates their commitment to controls by: Establishing a clear code of conduct. Defining roles and responsibilities. Enforcing accountability and integrity throughout the organization. When employees have a clear understanding of their role, and integrity is a core value, they thrive. 5. Automation: The Evolution of Safety In 1959, the 3-point lap and shoulder seatbelt was introduced by Volvo, improving upon the existing 2-point lap belt. This innovation dramatically improved safety by distributing crash forces across the entire upper body. It's estimated that the 3-point seatbelt has saved over 400,000 lives in the United States since its introduction. In the control environment, automation is that evolution. Many financial institutions still rely on manual controls like checklists, data entry, and sample-based testing. While these measures mitigate some risk (most of the time), they are susceptible to human error and don’t provide real-time results. Automation can: Reduce human error and provide real-time results. Expand data reviews and improve compliance. Enhance reporting and provide a clear audit trail. However, automation is not a silver bullet. It must be properly vetted and tested to ensure it aligns with the corresponding controls. Otherwise, it's just a new, more complicated way to be unsafe. The Gold Standard for Your Bank When companies face sanctions, penalties, or even closure, it serves as a powerful deterrent. It’s time to change the narrative and make your bank a gold standard for effective controls. When internal controls are in place, the fatalities of fraud and misreporting are diminished, employees are productive, and customers are satisfied. Everyone wins. Why Partner With Spinnaker We’re a boutique team of seasoned banking professionals, each with over a decade of hands-on experience in regulatory compliance, risk management, and analytics. As former operators, risk leaders, and strategists, we’ve led through recessions, regulatory shifts, and digital transformations. We know what works because we've done the work. Our approach is FAST, FLEXIBLE, and TAILORED TO YOUR NEEDS. We partner with banks across the U.S. to: Assess and enhance internal control structures Map controls to Risk, Processes, Regulatory Requirements, and Testing Conduct independent control reviews and risk- based walkthroughs Identify automation opportunities Facilitate training in internal controls Support internal audit and exam preparation Provide fractional risk and compliance leadership Provide staff augmentation to perform control activities Whether you’re looking for a one-time assessment or a long-term partner. We help you take control of what matters most. Let’s shore up your internal controls together -> Learn More about Spinnaker's Approach to Shoring Up Internal Controls Customer Channels & Operations Management, Risk Management & Regulatory Compliance, Internal Controls, Automation 4 minute read](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/internal-controls-your-banks-seat-belt-system) ### [Recoveries Optimization Enhances Compliance, Revenue and Customer Experience Oct 16, 2020 The Big Picture In today’s heightened regulatory environment, it’s hard to imagine that just a decade ago, banks handed over charged-off accounts to outside recoveries agencies without much thought. After all, the bad debt had been written off and the banks had already invested considerable resources during the collections process trying to get those customers reestablished. Customer Channels & Operations Management, Data & Analytics, Risk Management & Regulatory Compliance 6 minute read](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/insights/blog/recoveries_optimization) - Let's **Talk** - [804.510.0768](tel:804.510.0768) - [info@spinnakerconsultinggroup.com](mailto:info@spinnakerconsultinggroup.com) - [mailto:info@spinnakerconsultinggroup.com](mailto:info@spinnakerconsultinggroup.com) - #### Subscribe To Our Blog Like how we think? Subscribe to have our articles delivered direct to your inbox each month. **Headquarters:** [8000 Franklin Farms Drive, Suite 100, Richmond, VA 23229](https://www.google.com/maps?ll=37.60197,-77.545775&z=17&t=m&hl=en&gl=US&mapclient=embed&cid=10375661570052893047) ©2026 Spinnaker Consulting Group. All rights reserved. - [Privacy Policy](https://www.spinnakerconsultinggroup.com/privacy-policy) ![](https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=552770&fmt=gif)